Justia - Badge
Lawyer.com - Badge
Avvo Rating - Badge
Super Lawyers - Peter - Badge
Super Lawyers - Matthew - Badge
Lead Counsel Rated - Badge
Kev's Best - Badge

Employment Lawyers Ask Supreme Court to Review Due Process Case

Famighetti & Weinick

On April 1, 2021, Long Island employment lawyers Famighetti & Weinick PLLC filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. The Petition asks the court to take up a case concerning the due process rights of public employees. Today’s Long Island employment law blog discusses the case and the petition.

Since 2019, employment attorney Matt Weinick has worked as co-counsel representing four former high ranking New York City Police Department officers. On behalf of the officers and along with co-counsel, the firm filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of New York alleging that the City of New York Police Department deprived the officers of due process by coercing their resignations without providing notice of charges against them or an opportunity to be heard about allegations of wrongdoing, constituting a deprivation of due process. The complaint alleged that the City acted to avoid a departmental hearing and wanted the officers removed from the department to take the fall for ongoing allegations of widespread corruption in the department. The case received press attention from, among other papers, the New York Post.

After the lawsuit was filed, the City ask the court to dismiss the case. The City argued that a 1984 case decided by New York’s federal appellate court, prohibited employees from suing municipalities for a violation of due process, when the claim is based on an allegation that the employees’ resignations were coerced. The trial court agreed and dismissed the case.

F&W and co-counsel appealed the decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, New York’s federal appellate court. On appeal, the firm argued, among other things, that (1) cases from the Second Circuit since the 1984 decision show why the case was improperly decided and (2) other appellate jurisdictions allow these types of claims to proceed, so the court should follow the lead of these other jurisdictions. Weinick orally argued the case before a three judge panel of the appellate court.

In a brief decision issued just weeks later, the court ruled that the 1984 case remained the law of the jurisdiction and barred the former officers’ lawsuit. The court affirmed the trial court’s decision to dismiss the case.

On April 2, 2021, Weinick, as counsel of record, and his co-counsel, filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. Appeals to the Supreme Court are not automatic. Rather, the court must decide which appeals to hear and which to deny. A Petition for Writ of Certiorari is the procedure used to ask the court to take up the case.

In this Petition, the employment lawyers argued that the Second Circuit’s decision conflicts with the law of the eight other jurisdictions in the country. The Petition showed how eight other appellate jurisdictions either outright allow, or would allow under the proper circumstances, a due process case to proceed based on a claim of a coerced resignation, such as in this case.

Further, the Petition discussed why a rule allowing such a claim to proceed is correct, and why the Second Circuit’s adherence to a rule which prohibits such claims is wrong.

The City of New York will have an opportunity to respond to the Petition. Then, the Supreme Court justices will decide whether the Petition should be granted. If granted, it’s not the end of the process. It means only that the court has decided to take up the case. Then, the parties will submit more legal briefing to the court and then appear for oral argument to answer the justice’s questions about the case.

If you have questions about due process, the Supreme Court, or a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, contact a Long Island employment lawyer at 631-352-0050.

Employment Lawyers Ask Supreme Court to Review Due Process Case

Client Reviews

From my personal experience, Matthew Weinick has always managed to go above and beyond as an attorney. While handling my case, he was very professional, supportive and reassuring. It was easy to see his devotion in bringing me justice from day one. I saw how invested he was which motivated me to...

Ariel Kaygisiz

Very grateful for all the hard work! Mr. Famighetti did an amazing job. He was very knowledgeable and I was always kept up to date on the details of our matter. I appreciate the attentiveness and the time taken to explain each step and answer any questions I had during the process. I would...

Danielle

Matt Weinick is an excellent attorney. With his assistance I was able to get exonerated from false allegations against me.

Sara

Mr. Weinick is the utmost professional. I called him for help with an employment issue and I was in his office the next day for a free, almost hour long, consultation. I ultimately retained him for his services and his professionalism continued, he is extremely talented and well versed in employment...

Tom Orlik

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Available 24/7
  3. 3 Se Habla Español
Fill out the contact form or call us at (631) 352-0050 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message