Justia - Badge
Lawyer.com - Badge
Avvo Rating - Badge
Super Lawyers - Peter - Badge
Super Lawyers - Matthew - Badge
Lead Counsel Rated - Badge
Kev's Best - Badge

Famighetti & Weinick, PLLC Wins Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement

Famighetti & Weinick

For nearly four years, parties battled in federal court over whether the plaintiff was entitled to unpaid overtime, liquidated damages, and attorneys fees and costs from the defendants.

Then, in early December 2014, Famighetti & Weinick, PLLC entered the case as the new attorneys for the defendants. In less than two months, firm partner, Peter Famighetti, was able to overcome the divide that separated the parties in settlement discussions. The plaintiff’s attorney represented to Famighetti that the proposed terms were acceptable and that the case was settled.

On consent of the plaintiff’s lawyer, Famighetti advised the Court that the parties had reached a settlement in principal, finalized the settlement agreement, and that the parties would be executing the written agreement within weeks. The next day, the Court closed the case.

Days later, however, the plaintiff met with his attorney to sign the agreement. According to his lawyer’s statements to the Court, the plaintiff told his lawyer that he refused to sign the agreement because he thought his lawyer’s fees would be paid by the defendants, which was not the agreement. His lawyer then asked the Court to re-open the case, but Famighetti cross-moved to enforce the settlement.

On March 17, 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Arthur D. Spatt granted Famighetti’s motion to enforce the settlement and denied the plaintiff’s motion to re-open the case. Judge Spatt reviewed the relevant case law, applied the facts presented, and found that the settlement agreement was enforceable as a “type I preliminary agreement”, meaning it was an enforceable agreement. Judge Spatt further noted that the plaintiff’s attorney had apparent authority to settle the case and Famighetti had no reason to doubt that authority, so the settlement would be enforced and the case would remain closed. Finally, Judge Spatt held that the plaintiff did not need to be compelled to sign the written agreement for him to be bound by it.

Client Reviews

From my personal experience, Matthew Weinick has always managed to go above and beyond as an attorney. While handling my case, he was very professional, supportive and reassuring. It was easy to see his devotion in bringing me justice from day one. I saw how invested he was which motivated me to...

Ariel Kaygisiz

Very grateful for all the hard work! Mr. Famighetti did an amazing job. He was very knowledgeable and I was always kept up to date on the details of our matter. I appreciate the attentiveness and the time taken to explain each step and answer any questions I had during the process. I would...

Danielle

Matt Weinick is an excellent attorney. With his assistance I was able to get exonerated from false allegations against me.

Sara

Mr. Weinick is the utmost professional. I called him for help with an employment issue and I was in his office the next day for a free, almost hour long, consultation. I ultimately retained him for his services and his professionalism continued, he is extremely talented and well versed in employment...

Tom Orlik

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Available 24/7
  3. 3 Se Habla Español
Fill out the contact form or call us at (631) 352-0050 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message